2024 Professional Development Session Submission | American Society of Neurorehabilitation

Thank you for your interest in submitting a Professional Development Session proposal to be considered for inclusion in the 2024 ASNR Annual Meeting Program in San Antonio, TX.

All Organizers must submit a financial disclosure form prior to submitting their proposal. CLICK HERE to complete your disclosure.

Select the type of submission/presentation your session will demonstrate (below you will find a detailed explanation of each style) *

Description:
Panel - Tied into the list of preferred topics, this would be a proposal to form a panel of experts to discuss one of the professional development topics being showcased. The proposal would need to contain a proposed method of discussion, and the names of potential panelists. The objective would be to explore the professional development topic thoroughly and interactively, from the experience and perspectives of the expert panelists.

Demonstration - Tied into the list of preferred topics, this would be a proposal to form a panel of experts to actively demonstrate/teach the audience a cutting edge skill or practice through a combination of lecture  and interactive hands-on experience.

Workshop - Tied into the list of preferred topics, this would be a proposal to teach the audience a skill or practice through a combination of lecture format and hands-on experience to enhance a specific domain of professional development.

Conflicting perspectives - i.e. debate - This would be a proposal to form a panel of experts to engage in critical discussion on a professional development topic of interest, including the presentation of points and counter arguments on the topic from a neurorehabilitation perspective.

Title of Professional Development Session: *
What new information will you be presenting and how does it impact the overall field of neurorehabilitation?
(Maximum characters: 2000)
You have characters left.
Educational Objective 1 *
Educational Objective 2 *
Educational Objective 3 *
Synopsis - Professional Development summary of no more than 250 words *
(Maximum characters: 2000)
You have characters left.
Name of organizer: *
Organizer degree(s) *
How will you incorporate active learning into this professional development experience? (examples: breakout groups, anonymous question submission, pre-event preparation, group worksheet/tool, collective problem solving. No more than 250 words) *
(Maximum characters: 2000)
You have characters left.
Affiliation: *
Email *
Currently a member of the ASNR (Organizer must be a current ASNR member) *

Clear Selection

Please list up to two additional presenters below.  Please note: All presenters will need to complete a financial disclosure form.

Presenters: Names, titles, institutions, and email addresses. Please note: Any non-member speakers must receive prior approval from the Program Chair.
Please describe in detail how proposed presenters will add to the diversity of the ASNR Annual Meeting (age, race, gender, area of research, etc.)
Funding source(s): List applicable funding sources for all presenters
A rough draft agenda with times. Please provide schedule:
(Maximum characters: 2000)
You have characters left.

SAMPLE INSTRUCTIONAL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SESSION:
Title: Research Study Management: Manageable Bites or More than You Can Chew?
Type of Symposium: Panel    
Educational Objectives: On completion of this session participants will be able to
- Discuss pros and cons of the Spinal Cord Injury Functional Index (SCI-FI)and the Shriners Hospitals for Children (SHC) Pediatric Measure (SHC-Pediatric Measure)
- Appreciate the advantages of having the capability to measure function in a continuous way across the lifespan and describe how adult and pediatric measures can be linked
- Discuss considerations in selecting short form vs. computer adaptive (CAT) functional measures for SCI clinical practice and research
- Explain how innovative adult and pediatric SCI functional assessments can be incorporated to advance SCI research and clinical practice

Synopsis:
This session will include highlights from opportunities and challenges clinical scientists from diverse backgrounds (stage of career, type of research, varying populations) as well as different neurorehabilitation backgrounds have faced during their careers. The aim is to share what has worked and what has not, and to garner unique and transparent perspectives in navigating the academic landscape in our fields. Themes that we will focus on include appropriateness of study to career juncture, choosing your study team and study participant diversity.

Symposium Organizer:
John Doe, PhD
Professor
University
John.doe@school.edu

Presenters:
Susan Doe, PT
Professor
University Public Health
susan.doe@school.edu 

Tom Doe, MA
Scientist
Institute for Rehabilitation
tom.doe@school.edu

Funding Sources:
Hospitals for Children #123456
NIDRR #ABCD123
NIH #ABCD123

Draft Schedule:
0:00 – 0:20      SCI-FI: Results (John Doe)
0:20 – 0:40      Linking Functional Measures (Susan Doe)
0:40 – 0:60      Considerations for Using Measures (Laura Doe)
0:60 – 0:90      Discussion




Fields marked with * are required.

Your form submission WILL be encrypted using SSL to ensure your privacy.

image widget